Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won
Last updated March 22, 2009
There are five kinds of denials in federal court:
|a. General: The defendant may make a "general" denial, by which he/she denies each and every allegation in your complaint. But the defend must then contest all of your allegations, or face possible sanctions.|
|FRCP 8(b) Denials shall fairly meet the substance of averments denied. When pleader intends in good faith to deny only a part or a qualification of an averment, he shall specify so much of it as true and shall deny only the remainder.|
b. Specific: Defendant may make a "specific" denial, which he/she denies all of the allegations of a particular paragraph or count of the complaint.
c. Qualified: Defendant may make a "qualified" denial, i.e., a denial of a particular portion of a particular allegation.
d. Knowledge or information: Defendant may make a denial of knowledge or information (DKI), by which he says that he/she does not have enough knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of your complaint. You will see a lot of this denial as well as the next denial.
e. Information and belief: Defendant may deny "based on information and belief." By this, Defendant effectively says, "I don't know for sure, but I reasonably believe that your allegation is false." Corporate lawyers just love the hell out of this one.
|White v. Smith -- DC WDNY 1981: Plaintiff's claims were plainly and cogently presented to show with detail specific description of events with names, dates, and documents. Defendant should have taken a look at records and compare with allegations to make meaningful answers to charges. A wholly inadequate response and not in good faith. Stretches credibility to say "to best of knowledge" on all allegations.|
|We are not lawyers and we cannot give you legal advice. Our opinions and the information provided is based upon our experiences in federal court as well as research. You should always contact an attorney if you have a legal problem.|
Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions
Initial Interest Confusion |
Likelihood Of Confusion |
Material Difference Standard
Parallel Imports | Post-sale Confusion | Puffery | Secondary Meaning | Subsequent Confusion | Trademark Abuse
Unauthorized Use | Unfair Competition | What is a Trademark?
Angel Policies |
Contributory Infringement |
Copyright Extortion |
Copyright Misuse Doctrine
; Derivative | The Digital Millennium Copyright Act | EULA | Fair Use | First Sale Doctrine | Product Description | Registration
Registration Denied | What is a Copyright? | What is not Copyrightable?
Embroidery Designs |
FAQs & Whines |
Image and Text Theft |
Licensed Fabric |
Licensing & Licenses |
Patterns Index | Profit | Quilting | Selvage | Stanford School of Law Case Outline
Tabberone Disclaimer | Trademark Extortion | Urban Myths | What To Do If You Are Veroed
Federal Court Cases |
Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations
Federal Statutes |
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22
VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program)|
VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter
Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed
|Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2017|