Tabberone Logo

Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won
not tay ber own

Tabbers Temptations     www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/ Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke


The Tabberone™ Archives
These articles concern what we consider major trademark and copyright issues. They are usually reproduced with the original source referenced. Bear in mind, these articles are copyrighted and commercial use without permission of the authors may be considered infringement. The intended use here is educational, commentary and non-commercial. The reason they are reproduced in the Tabberone™ Archives, as opposed to just providing a link, is because links disappear and pages are removed. That presents a messy confirmation process that is annoying to the browser (you) but also presents a credibility issue. We do not claim any rights in these pieces. Do not regard the absence of a copyright statement or © to mean the article is not copyrighted. Some sites do not have a copyright statement.

When an article or a comment is posted on the internet by the copyright owner, the owner is seeking a world-wide, 24/7 audience; sometimes for a limited amount of time, sometimes indefinitely. In essence, an internet posting intentionally relinquishes one's copyright for exclusivity because the owner has posted it on the internet to been seen by everyone, everywhere. The Tabberone™ Archives non-commercial duplication of the posting is simply a continuance of the original wishes of the copyright owner. We post these articles for reference, for commentary and for confirmarion of our position.

Source:
http://www.ladas.com/BULLETINS/1996/0896Bulletin/US5.0896.html

United States - Descriptive Uses of Trademarks Are Protected Under the Fair Use Doctrine

In Car-Freshner Corporation v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that, under the fair use doctrine, the acquisition of trademark rights in words or images does not prevent others from using those same words or images as long as such use is descriptive and in good faith.

Plaintiff Car-Freshner sells scented cardboard air fresheners for cars in the shape of pine trees and has established trademark rights in, among other things, the shape of its product. Defendant S.C. Johnson also sells air fresheners. S.C. Johnson's air freshener is a plastic device containing a cartridge of scented gel that releases fragrance into the air when the device is plugged into an electrical outlet. Car-Freshner commenced this lawsuit against S.C. Johnson when it discovered that S.C. Johnson was selling, during the Christmas holiday season, a plug in air freshener in the shape of a pine tree. Car-Freshner claimed, among other things, that S.C. Johnson's use of a pine tree shape infringed its trademark rights in the pine tree shape of its cardboard air fresheners. S.C. Johnson moved for summary judgment on the grounds of fair use and no likelihood of confusion.

The district court rejected S.C. Johnson's claim of fair use on the ground that the fair use defense applies only to marks that are descriptive, and not when, as was the case here, the mark is suggestive. The district court, nonetheless, granted summary judgment to S.C. Johnson on the ground that the two air freshener products were not confusingly similar. Car Freshner appealed the award of summary judgment for S.C. Johnson, and S.C. Johnson cross appealed with respect to the district court's ruling on the issue of fair use.

The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment, but on the ground of fair use. The court held that the trademark fair use doctrine permits others to use protected trademarks to describe characteristics of their goods as long as the use is descriptive and not trademark use. In this case, S.C. Johnson's use was descriptive, since it described the scent of the air freshener and referred to the season during which this particular air freshener was sold, i.e., the Christmas season. In holding that S.C. Johnson's use was permissible, the Second Circuit rejected the notion that fair use could be used as a defense only against a mark that is classified as descriptive, explaining that the key is not whether the word or image is classified as descriptive, but whether the defendant's use of the protected word or image is descriptive.

General
Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions

Corporate Lawyers
Cartoons | Code Of Ethics | Courtroom Remarks | Definition Of A Lie | Jokes | Lawyers | Lying | Who Have Lied

eBay - Land The Game

Definitions

Trademark Definitions
Blurring   |   Confusion   |   Damages   |   Dilution   |   History   |   Initial Interest Confusion   |   Likelihood Of Confusion   |   Material Difference Standard
Parallel Imports   |   Post-sale Confusion   |   Puffery   |   Secondary Meaning   |   Subsequent Confusion   |   Trademark Abuse
Unauthorized Use   |   Unfair Competition   |   What is a Trademark?
Copyright Definitions
Angel Policies   |   Contributory Infringement   |   Copyrightability   |   Copyright Extortion   |   Copyright Misuse Doctrine
Derivative   |   The Digital Millennium Copyright Act   |   EULA   |   Fair Use   |   First Sale Doctrine   |   Product Description
Registration   |   Registration Denied   |   What is a Copyright?   |   What is not Copyrightable?
Other Issues
Embroidery Designs   |   FAQs & Whines   |   Image and Text Theft   |   Licensed Fabric   |   Licensing & Licenses   |   Patterns
Patterns Index   |   Profit   |   Quilting   |   Selvage   |   Stanford School of Law Case Outline
Tabberone Disclaimer   |   Trademark Extortion   |   Urban Myths   |   What To Do If You Are Veroed

Federal Court Cases
Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations

Federal Statutes
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22

VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program)
VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter
Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed

Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2019

 

 

web page hit counter