Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!





| Embroidery Designs and how they are affected by copyright law |
|
Last Updated June 30, 2008 When someone releases patterns into the stream of commerce they effectively have relinquished control over the uses of that pattern regardless of the format of that design. Embroidery designers want to control the use of their designs as much as the manufacturers of regular fabric patterns. They do this to create a larger market for their product. They do this in direct conflict with federal laws.While the embroidery pattern itself may be copyrighted, the product made from that pattern is not. Additionally, embroidery manufactuers have a double whammy when trying to comply with copyright law. Not only do they need to protect the final design but they need to copyright the computer program that makes the final design. The embroidery pattern is a set of instructions to a computer for making a utilitarian object. While the way those computer instructions are expressed is copyrightable, the finished item is utilitarian and not subject to copyright Logically, how can a copyright extend to the item made using the embroidery pattern? The embroidery pattern copyright only covers the physical pattern purchased. To be guilty of copyright infringement one would have to copy the software and sell it or give it away. The purchaser, that being you, buys the embroidery pattern for a fixed amount of money. It is now yours and the manufacturer no longer has any legal control over what you do with the pattern except that under Copyright law you may not:
Many embroidery pattern manufactures falsely claim that you cannot make items to sell from their patterns without their approval or a license. Like other software, embroidery patterns are sold, not licensed. The 8th Circuit in 2006 rules that embroidery software was not really software, which is interactive, but actually mere "instructons" to a sewing machine saying that Action Tapes' memory cards contain only data, not computer programs, and are not covered by federal software laws. In Bobbs-Merril vs Straus, 210 U.S. 339 (1908), the Supreme Court limited the rights of copyright holders to only those allowed by statute. These claims of expanded limits on the copyrights are false and unsupported by federal law. Beginning with Bobbs-Merril vs Straus, federal courts have regularly rejected attempts by copyright holders to expand their right beyond those allowed by statute. So why do they continue to do it? Because they can. And often, people believe their claims. Mostly because they want to believe the claims. Many, many, crafting boards have comments posed where the crafters believe, or want to believe, the embroidery pattern manfacturer can limit what someone does with their patterns. Image Disney selling a coloring book and demanding only certain colors can be used for certain characters or they will sue for copyright infringement. The coloring book is yours after you purchase it; color it as you wish.. However, this fact will not stop these companies from improperly interferring with you attempting to make items to sell. Why do they do it? Because they know the average person will not fight back. These companies, supported by their unethical bottom-feeder corporate lawyers, will continue their mis-information campaigns until stopped by a civil suit. See also Copyrightability for more information and court cases supporting these arguments. See also "End User Licensing Agreement" ("EULA") for more information and court cases supporting licensing statements. |
| See also Licensed Fabrics and also Licensing & Licenses. |


|
General Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Hall Of Shame | Contributions
Corporate Lawyers
Links |
|
Definitions |
|
Federal Statutes Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22
Filing A Federal Lawsuit |
|
VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program) VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed |