Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!





| Unauthorized Use |
|
The Lanham Act plainly refers to someone who, without authorization, uses or imitates another's mark in such a
way as to possibly cause confusion. Confusion is the benchmark of Trademark Infringement. Without confusion there is no infringement.
The Lanam Act states:
Sec. 1114. - (1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant - shall be liable in a civil action by the registrant for the remedies hereinafter provided. Under subsection (b) hereof, the registrant shall not be entitled to recover profits or damages unless the acts have been committed with knowledge that such imitation is intended to be used to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive. The wording is sepcific. The Lanham Act refers to "counterfeits" and "reproductions". Lawfully acquired copyrighted fabric does not fall into the the categories defined in the Lanham Act. But, unethical lawyers use the phrase "without the consent of the registrant" to foist the "unautorized" attack upon lawful use of the fabrics. The Lanham Act also states that the "registrant" cannot recover damages if the offender did not intend to cause confusion or did not intend to deceive the public. The burdon of proof is on trademark owner to prove intent. |


|
General Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Hall Of Shame | Contributions
Corporate Lawyers
Links |
|
Definitions |
|
Federal Statutes Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22
Filing A Federal Lawsuit |
|
VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program) VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed |