Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won |
|
The Tabberone™ Archives These articles concern what we consider major trademark and copyright issues. They are usually reproduced with the original source referenced. Bear in mind, these articles are copyrighted and commercial use without permission of the authors may be considered infringement. The intended use here is educational, commentary and non-commercial. The reason they are reproduced in the Tabberone™ Archives, as opposed to just providing a link, is because links disappear and pages are removed. That presents a messy confirmation process that is annoying to the browser (you) but also presents a credibility issue. We do not claim any rights in these pieces. Do not regard the absence of a copyright statement or © to mean the article is not copyrighted. Some sites do not have a copyright statement. When an article or a comment is posted on the internet by the copyright owner, the owner is seeking a world-wide, 24/7 audience; sometimes for a limited amount of time, sometimes indefinitely. In essence, an internet posting intentionally relinquishes one's copyright for exclusivity because the owner has posted it on the internet to been seen by everyone, everywhere. The Tabberone™ Archives non-commercial duplication of the posting is simply a continuance of the original wishes of the copyright owner. We post these articles for reference, for commentary and for confirmarion of our position. |
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7252707.stm |
COMPUTER SOFTWARE TERMS 'UNFAIR' (BBC, 19 Feb 2008)
Some of the world's biggest computer firms have been accused of imposing unfair contracts on customers who buy their software. The National Consumer Council (NCC) has accused 17 firms, including Microsoft, Adobe and Symantec, of using unfair "end user licence agreements" (EULAs). | Microsoft is one of the firms the NCC wants to see investigated |
The NCC has asked the Office of Fair Trading to launch an investigation. The NCC said the firms' EULAs were misleading customers into "signing away legal rights".
"Software rights-holders are shifting the legal burden on to consumers who buy computer programmes, leaving them with less protection than when they buy a cheap Biro," said Carl Belgrove of the NCC. The NCC has asked the Office of Fair Trading to launch an investigation. The NCC said the firms' EULAs were misleading customers into "signing away legal rights". "Software rights-holders are shifting the legal burden on to consumers who buy computer programmes, leaving them with less protection than when they buy a cheap Biro," said Carl Belgrove of the NCC. "Consumers can't have a clue what they're signing up to when some terms and conditions run to 10 or more pages. "There's a significant imbalance between the rights of the consumer and the rights of the holder," he added. 'Legal responsibility' As one of the firms named by the NCC, Microsoft said it had not seen the details of the report and was unable to comment. But it added that it was committed to dealing "fairly" with consumers and addressing any concerns they might have. Meanwhile Symantec said it would welcome the opportunity to engage with the NCC and any other organisations in order to best serve the interests of its customers. The NCC looked at 25 software packages and said that in 17 instances, the packaging did not tell potential buyers they would have to sign an EULA in order to use it. While some contained the EULA inside an instruction manual, or let it be read online, this was only after the software had been bought. "This means that consumers are unable to make informed decisions before they buy a product, yet are being forced to take on an unknown level of legal responsibility," said the NCC. After examining the contents of the EULAs, the NCC also said that some contained potentially unfair clauses. ©BBC MMVIII |
General Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions
Corporate Lawyers |
Definitions |
Federal Court Cases Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations |
Federal Statutes Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22
|