Tabberone Logo

Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won
not tay ber own

Tabbers Temptations     www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/ Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke


The Tabberone™ Archives
These articles concern what we consider major trademark and copyright issues. They are usually reproduced with the original source referenced. Bear in mind, these articles are copyrighted and commercial use without permission of the authors may be considered infringement. The intended use here is educational, commentary and non-commercial. The reason they are reproduced in the Tabberone™ Archives, as opposed to just providing a link, is because links disappear and pages are removed. That presents a messy confirmation process that is annoying to the browser (you) but also presents a credibility issue. We do not claim any rights in these pieces. Do not regard the absence of a copyright statement or © to mean the article is not copyrighted. Some sites do not have a copyright statement.

When an article or a comment is posted on the internet by the copyright owner, the owner is seeking a world-wide, 24/7 audience; sometimes for a limited amount of time, sometimes indefinitely. In essence, an internet posting intentionally relinquishes one's copyright for exclusivity because the owner has posted it on the internet to been seen by everyone, everywhere. The Tabberone™ Archives non-commercial duplication of the posting is simply a continuance of the original wishes of the copyright owner. We post these articles for reference, for commentary and for confirmarion of our position.

Source:
http://www.desktopnexus.com/blog/tag/continental-enterprises/

February 20, 2010 - this is page 1 of the article. There is a link at the bottom of this page to page two of the article.

Desktop Nexus Blog

DMCA Trademark Claim?

by Harry on May.07, 2009, under Site Updates

I’m sure a number of you remember our run-in with Toyota a few months back. Well in the past few weeks we’ve hit another gray area with a different company regarding DMCA.

On Desktop Nexus, we respond to each and every DMCA Takedown Notice with prompt attention and expedience, and we usually end up removing about 3-4 wallpapers per week. We’ve even gone as far as developing an image blacklisting system to prevent copyrighted wallpapers from being reuploaded after they’re taken down for DMCA violations.

On April 13th 2009, we received formal notice requesting the removal of a Monster Energy Drink wallpaper, sent to us by Continental Enterprises representing Hansen Beverage Company. I’ve included the full email conversation after the break. It was a little vague, not specifically citing that they were requesting the deletion under DMCA. I was curious if this was another large corporation scare tactic, so I sent them a response, asking for clarification on what precise actions they’d like me to take.

I never got a response, and a few more weeks went by. On April 30th 2009, we received a “Second Correspondence”, which claimed they had not gotten any response from me, and boldly stated:

If you do not take immediate steps to resolve this issue, [Hansen Beverage Company] will be forced to take more aggressive action to protect their intellectual property rights.

which I took to be a threat of potential legal action. They also requested three additional wallpapers be deleted as well. Reviewing their previous correspondence, I made the decision to go ahead and remove the wallpapers, as the incident is very gray and I do want to keep Desktop Nexus on the legal side of the fence. Plus we can’t exactly afford a lawsuit right now, heh.

But then a week later, I unexpectedly received a reply to the email I sent back on April 13th requesting clarification. It simply said:

Thank you for your email. In response to your question, we would like you to understand we are asserting a trademark claim, not a copyright claim. Therefore, we cannot allow you to use the Hansen/Monster Energy trademarks.

They are asserting a trademark claim? They also said very clearly this was not a copyright claim. I suddenly regretted deleting those wallpapers, because I have a feeling what they’re doing is illegal. I did a little research on Continental Enterprises and turned up a number of horror stories involving their operation. To quote tabberone.com:

In our opinion, Continental Enterprises qualifies as the personification of a Trademark Extortionist. This Indianapolis-based company has taken trademark extortion to a new level.

They even went as far as filing a trademark infringement lawsuit against Tippman Sports a few days ago.

Desktop Nexus has over 600 new wallpapers being uploaded every day, making it impractical for us to manually moderate all the uploads. For this reason, sites like ours are protected under DMCA law, which requires us to take down content that violates copyrights in the event the copyright holder (or authorized agent) contacts us and makes a formal request. No problem. This however, is not a copyright issue. Continental Enterprises clearly stated they were not making a copyright claim. So I ask, does DMCA cover trademark issues as well, or are they trying to bully a smaller company into yielding to their whims? Did they have legal grounds to request we remove the wallpapers, and if so, did they approach it in a proper, legal way? Do we have any recourse in a situation like this? I want to remain legal in all of our actions of course, however I also feel large companies who abuse the legal system should be called out and have their ways exposed.

What do you guys think? (continue reading…)

DesktopNexus.com © 2008 Maugans Incorporated. All Rights Reserved


To return to the Continental Enterprises Articles Page, click here.

General
Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions

Corporate Lawyers
Cartoons | Code Of Ethics | Courtroom Remarks | Definition Of A Lie | Jokes | Lawyers | Lying | Who Have Lied

eBay - Land The Game

Definitions

Trademark Definitions
Blurring   |   Confusion   |   Damages   |   Dilution   |   History   |   Initial Interest Confusion   |   Likelihood Of Confusion   |   Material Difference Standard
Parallel Imports   |   Post-sale Confusion   |   Puffery   |   Secondary Meaning   |   Subsequent Confusion   |   Trademark Abuse
Unauthorized Use   |   Unfair Competition   |   What is a Trademark?
Angel Policies   |   Contributory Infringement   |   Copyrightability   |   Copyright Extortion   |   Copyright Misuse Doctrine
Derivative   |   The Digital Millennium Copyright Act   |   EULA   |   Fair Use   |   First Sale Doctrine   |   Product Description
Registration   |   Registration Denied   |   What is a Copyright?   |   What is not Copyrightable?
Other Issues
Embroidery Designs   |   FAQs & Whines   |   Image and Text Theft   |   Licensed Fabric   |   Licensing & Licenses
Patterns   |   Patterns Index   |   Profit   |   Quilting   |   Selvage   |   Stanford School of Law Case Outline
Tabberone Disclaimer   |   Trademark Extortion   |   Urban Myths   |   What To Do If You Are Veroed

Federal Court Cases
Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations

Federal Statutes
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22

VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program)
VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter
Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed

Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2019