Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!

Source: http://www.cll.com/news-details.cfm?NewsID=76&Print=1
October 16, 2008 - content has not been altered.

Summary Judgment Awarded to CLL Clients in "Love Potion" Case

08/13/2008

Arlana Cohen and Eric Shimanoff successfully defended our client, Dessert Beauty, Inc., and its customer, Sephora, Inc., against a lawsuit in which an individual named Mara Fox claimed that her registered trademark LOVE POTION for perfumed essential oils was infringed by our clients’ use on DESSERT fragrances of phrases like “deliciously kissable love potion fragrance.”

The Court awarded our clients a summary judgment on the grounds that this was a statutory fair use of the term “love potion.” The Court concluded, among other things, that it is fair use for a term like “love potion” to be used in its descriptive sense, even though it does not actually describe the product. In this case, the product was not, in actuality, a love potion but these words described the purpose for which consumers would use the product. The Court also found that the defendants’ failure to conduct a preliminary search and their refusal to cease sales after receiving cease and desist letters were insufficient to establish bad faith as a matter of law.

Dessert Beauty, Inc. v. Mara Fox, 5 Civ. 3872 (DC) (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2008).

© 2008 Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.
1133 Avenue of the Americas • New York, NY 10036-6799
T (212) 790-9200 • F (212) 575-0671 | law@cll.com
Attorney Advertising

General
Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions

Corporate Lawyers
Cartoons | Code Of Ethics | Courtroom Remarks | Definition Of A Lie | Jokes | Lawyers | Lying | Who Have Lied

eBay - Land The Game

Links
Auction Bytes | Public Citizen Litigation Group

Definitions

Trademark Definitions
Blurring   |   Confusion   |   Damages   |   Dilution   |   History   |   Initial Interest Confusion   |   Likelihood Of Confusion   |   Material Difference Standard
Parallel Imports   |   Puffery   |   Secondary Meaning   |   Subsequent Confusion   |   Trademark Abuse   |   Unauthorized Use   |   Unfair Competition   |   What is a Trademark?
Copyright Definitions
Contributory Infringement   |   Copyrightability   |   Copyright Misuse Doctrine   |   Derivative   |   The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
EULA   |   Fair Use   |   First Sale Doctrine   |   Product Description   |   Registration   |   What is a Copyright?   |   What is not Copyrightable?
Other Issues
Embroidery Designs   |   FAQs & Whines   |   Image and Text Theft   |   Licensed Fabric   |   Licensing & Licenses   |   Patterns   |   Profit   |   Quilting   |   Selvage
Stanford School of Law Case Outline   |   Tabberone Disclaimer   |   Trademark Extortion   |   Urban Myths   |   What To Do If You Are Veroed

Federal Court Cases
Alphabetically | by Circuit | by Subject

Federal Statutes
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22

Federal Lawsuits
Filing A Federal Lawsuit
Setting Up | Standing. | Joinder of Parties. | The Complaint | Their Answer | Default Judgment
F.R.C.P. 12(b) Motion | F.R.C.P. 12(f) Motion | Your Reply | Summary Judgment Motion | Affidavits | Time Extension

Defending Against A Federal Lawsuit
The Complaint | Your Answer | Denials | F.R.C.P. 12(b) Motion | F.R.C.P. 12(f) Motion | Affidavits | Time Extension

VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program)
VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter
Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed

iweb counter