Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won |
|
|
Ojon Corp Hall Of Shame Member |
Last Updated January 16, 2010
The "people of beautiful hair" and a shitty attitude. Their website gives their address as : Ojon™ Corp., 327 Church Street, Suite 21, Oakville, Ontario, L6J 1P2 Canada. They are just another cosmetic company who believes that if they add some odd ball smell to their lotions and increase the price, customers will actually believe the product is something special. Cow shit is special to gardeners but it is still cow shit.These Ojon people do not want their fine overpriced products being sold on eBay. eBay is beneath their dignity. In October, 2005, Ojon improperly shut down an auction by a seller named Melissa. Some frozen-brained dimwit named Cheryl Stewart told her: |
Dear Melissa, |
This stupidity qualifies Ojon for the Tabberone We Say So Award These people are idiots.
Fair Use allows the use of the product's name to sell a product. Pictures of the product are also allowed under the law. And, who cares if they do not
want their product sold on eBay? They don't have a legal leg to stand on there. Whatever they are using as a shampoo is rotting their brains. And Cheryl,
why do you not get a real job, say standing on the street corner waving at sailors? At least that job has some dignity attached rather than being a loser pimp
for a cosmetics ripoff.
A seller name Laurie ran into a similar problem. She emailed us in November 2005: |
I was selling hair care products by a company called "Ojon." I spoke with a VP on the phone and she stated that by simply showing their logo in the picture I took, I am violating their copyright. |
Ojon is WRONG again. Imagine trying to sell a car and not being able to say it's a Ford? A
picture of the product isn't infringing and never has been infringing.
So, what is copyrighted? Not their name because that is a trademark. Names cannot be copyrighted. The product label? Product labels, product specifications
and product descriptions cannot be copyrighted. Plus, Ojon has nothing registered with the US Copyright Office. So they are lying.
Ojon is ripe for a lawsuit here. Some idiot in their office decided to play god and is stuck on stupid. Also, does Ojon actually believe that their bone-headed tactics won't be publicized? It didn't take long for the issue to get onto the eBay chat boards, the PowerSeller Board on November 2, 2005. The word will spread that Ojon is an asshole outfit, their staff are jerks, and do not buy their products. These people will talk. |
 
 
Rebuttals
In an effort to provide a balanced view, we make the following offer to anyone who feels they have been wrongly accused on this web site. If you, or your company, have been referenced on these pages, and you would like the chance to post a rebuttal, we will post your rebuttal (provided it is in good taste) so others can read it. The rebuttal must be submitted in a format that can easily be converted into HTML. We reserve the right to alter the rebuttal to make it more readable. However, we will not alter the content (unless there is offensive material to be removed). We also reserve the right to comment on any rebuttal received. Emails protesting the content of this web site may be treated as rebuttals by us at our discretion. |
General Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions
Corporate Lawyers |
Definitions |
Federal Court Cases Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations |
Federal Statutes Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22 |
VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program) VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed |
Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2017 |