Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!





|
United Media Peanuts Hall Of Shame Member Added May 23, 2007 |
|
|
In November, 2003, United Media took exception to Tabberone making items from Peanuts fabric and then selling the items on eBay.
On November 14, 2003, eBay terminated six auctions by Tabberone. You can view two of these auctions, 3252338822 Snoopy Soccer Fabric Iridescent Fleece Quillow and 3252338454 Adorable Baby Snoopy Fabric Quillow. No one to take this sort of thing lightly, Tabberone immediately emailed United Media demanding a reason as to why the auctions were removed. United Media replied with the usual line of tripe about derivatives, copyright and trademark infringement, etc. They refused to restore the auctions. On November 18, 2003, Tabberone filed a counternotice with eBay concerning the auctions. As is her custom, she filed the counternotice while enroute to the Federal Courthouse in Denver, Colorado, to file a federal lawsuit against Untied Media, Civil Action No. 03-D-2298 (PAC). On February 3, 2004, United Media agreed to a settlment in which United Media agreed to recind the auction takedowns and not to interfere in future auctions by Tabberone involving the use of Peanuts fabric. 2½ months from lawsuit to settlement by yet another self-righteous legal department with no real concept of fair use and the first sale doctrine. Another billion-dollar company that didn't want to try and litigate the issues because they knew they would lose. Another VeRO bully who attacked non-infringing sellers thinking no one would ever stand up to them.
|


 
 
|
Rebuttals
In an effort to provide a balanced view, we make the following offer to anyone who feels they have been wrongly accused on this web site. If you, or your company, have been referenced on these pages, and you would like the chance to post a rebuttal, we will post your rebuttal (provided it is in good taste) so others can read it. The rebuttal must be submitted in a format that can easily be converted into HTML. We reserve the right to alter the rebuttal to make it more readable. However, we will not alter the content (unless there is offensive material to be removed). We also reserve the right to comment on any rebuttal received. Emails protesting the content of this web site may be treated as rebuttals by us at our discretion. We made this offer a very long time ago and as of July 2007, only AnimieHot.com, in our Hall Of Shame, has chosen to submit a formal rebuttal. |
|
General Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Hall Of Shame | Contributions
Corporate Lawyers
Links |
|
Definitions |
|
Federal Statutes Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22
Filing A Federal Lawsuit |
|
VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program) VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed |