Public Citizen Blog - Jenzabar Joins Trademark Abusers Hall of Shame

Tabberone Logo
Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won
not tay ber own

Tabbers Temptations www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/ Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke

The Tabberone™ Archives
These articles concern what we consider major trademark and copyright issues. They are usually reproduced with the original source referenced. Bear in mind, these articles are copyrighted and commercial use without permission of the authors may be considered infringement. The intended use here is educational, commentary and non-commercial. The reason they are reproduced in the Tabberone™ Archives, as opposed to just providing a link, is because links disappear and pages are removed. That presents a messy confirmation process that is annoying to the browser (you) but also presents a credibility issue. We do not claim any rights in these pieces. Do not regard the absence of a copyright statement or © to mean the article is not copyrighted. Some sites do not have a copyright statement.
When an article or a comment is posted on the internet by the copyright owner, the owner is seeking a world-wide, 24/7 audience; sometimes for a limited amount of time, sometimes indefinitely. In essence, an internet posting intentionally relinquishes one's copyright for exclusivity because the owner has posted it on the internet to been seen by everyone, everywhere. The Tabberone™ Archives non-commercial duplication of the posting is simply a continuance of the original wishes of the copyright owner. We post these articles for reference, for commentary and for confirmarion of our position.

http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2009/11/jenzabar-tries-to-forbid-blogging-about-its-abusive-trademark-litigation.html
November 27, 2009 - links have been removed.

Public Citizen Litigation Group

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Jenzabar Tries to Forbid Blogging About Its Abusive Trademark Litigation
The educational software company Jenzabar, whose abusive trademark claims were criticized in my own blog post here as well as by another Public Citizen employee on the Citizen Vox blog last month, is now claiming that such blogging is illegal. According to Jenzabar, a blog post nominating Jenzabar for the “ Trademark Abusers Hall of Shame” will “create controversy” and “cause prejudice to Jenzabar,” and any lawyer who engages in such blogging is in violation of Massachusetts court rules.
Jenzabar has sued the Long Bow Group for placing Jenzabar’s name in the keyword meta tags for a web page about Jenzabar, which, Jenzabar claims, has unfairly placed this web page among the top search results when Internet users do a search for “Jenzabar.” This placement, Jenzabar protests, allows university IT personnel who are trying to decide whether to buy Jenzabar’s software and services to learn adverse facts about Jenzabar which might, in turn, lead them to decide not to do business with Jenzabar.
Jenzabar is particularly exercised that my blog post cited a statement by Google back in September announcing that its search rankings have not employed keyword meta tags for many years. This information, Jenzabar insists, is not admissible in court because Matt Cutts’ statements on the subject on the Google’s blog for webmasters, which Google calls “Official News,” is not an “official statement by Google.” It appears to be Jenzabar's position that blog posts about a lawsuit must comply with the rules of evidence.
Interestingly, earlier this year, Long Bow published on its own web site, at the request of Jenzabar's counsel, a lengthy statement about the litigation. During her deposition, Jenzabar founder and former Tiananmen student leader Chai Ling testified it was Jenzabar’s own lawyers who wrote that “extrajudicial statement.” It seems that what is sauce for the goose is not sauce for the gander in Jenzabar’s book.
Jenzabar’s persistent efforts to suppress criticism continue to raise questions of hypocrisy in light of the company's use of its founder's life story, as a symbol of the resistance to tyranny in China, to promote its business.
Posted by Paul Levy on Thursday, November 05, 2009 at 02:31 PM

Federal Court Cases
Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations

Federal Statutes
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22
<