Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won |
|
The Tabberone™ Archives These articles concern what we consider major trademark and copyright issues. They are usually reproduced with the original source referenced. Bear in mind, these articles are copyrighted and commercial use without permission of the authors may be considered infringement. The intended use here is educational, commentary and non-commercial. The reason they are reproduced in the Tabberone™ Archives, as opposed to just providing a link, is because links disappear and pages are removed. That presents a messy confirmation process that is annoying to the browser (you) but also presents a credibility issue. We do not claim any rights in these pieces. Do not regard the absence of a copyright statement or © to mean the article is not copyrighted. Some sites do not have a copyright statement. When an article or a comment is posted on the internet by the copyright owner, the owner is seeking a world-wide, 24/7 audience; sometimes for a limited amount of time, sometimes indefinitely. In essence, an internet posting intentionally relinquishes one's copyright for exclusivity because the owner has posted it on the internet to been seen by everyone, everywhere. The Tabberone™ Archives non-commercial duplication of the posting is simply a continuance of the original wishes of the copyright owner. We post these articles for reference, for commentary and for confirmarion of our position. |
Source: http://www.gesmer.com/publications/article.php?ID=121 December 6, 2006 |
Federal Court Accepts Unique Copyright Attack on "Grey Market Goods"
July 1989 The problem of "grey market goods," also known as "parallel imports," is pervasive in international trade. Grey market goods are products lawfully manufactured outside the U.S., and then imported into the U.S. without the permission of owner of the U.S. trademark, copyright or patent associated with the product. In the most common situation a U.S. dealer finds that, due to favorable exchange rates or for other reasons, it can obtain a product overseas for less than the price charged by the authorized U.S. distributor. The dealer then imports the product into the U.S., undercutting the price of the product sold by the authorized U.S. distributor. The application of U.S. copyright law to the grey market sale of copyrighted works requires that an apparent contradiction be resolved. One provision in the law states that the owner of a copyright has a "bundle" of exclusive rights, including the right to distribute copies of the copyrighted work. Another provision of the law -- the so-called "first sale" doctrine -- states that once a copyrighted work is sold, the owner has no right to limit resale of the work. The courts have resolved the inconsistency between the "distribution right" and the "first sale" doctrine by creating a "bright line" test: generally speaking, if goods are manufactured and first sold outside the U.S., the U.S. copyright owner can restrict their importation into the U.S. However, if the goods are first sold inside the U.S., and later sold outside the U.S. by a legal purchaser, the copyright owner cannot object to the sale of the goods back into the U.S. See, e.g., BMG Music v. Perez , 952 F.2d 318 (9th Cir. 1991), cert. denied , 112 S. 2997 (1992).
2006 Gesmer Updegrove LLP | 40 Broad Street, Boston MA 02109 |
General Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions
Corporate Lawyers |
Definitions |
Federal Court Cases Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations |
Federal Statutes Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22 |
VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program) VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed |
Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2017 |