Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won
not tay ber own

Tabbers Temptations     www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/ Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!

Tabberone Logo
The latest Hartsel weather.

  "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke

Trademark Extortion Time Analysis

Any business can get a reasonably proficient individual for say $20,000 a year. Toss in extra taxes and benfits, and let's make the cost to a company at about $30,000 a year. That's a mere $600 a week or $120 a day. To most companies this is a cost of doing business. Not for extortionists.

Any reasonably proficient individual can locate any number of infringing auctions and/or offered sales on the internet when they are told to count almost everything they see, as we suspect they are told. But, for the sake of reasonable argument let's say they can locate ONLY one auction and/or offered sale a day that qualifies. So, the actual cost, assuming this reasonably proficient individual can ONLY find one a day, is a mere $120 per infringing letter. This is assuming they are on salary only. It's more likely they get incentives so the cost would be lower.

Yet, these letters routinely demand thousands of dollars for the alleged infractions. Most want at least forty times the assumed maximum cost as we have shown it. Why do they demand so much? Mo' money, mo' money, mo' money. It is reasonable to guess they are getting a percentage of the take after they remit the vig to the house, er, client. That's got to be the selling point to the clients. A company trolls the internet looking for infringement and no cost to them; they only get paid when they locate infringers and make them pay.

So, what is their percentage? They will deny such an agreemnt but we think they lie. It's probably a 75 - 25 split with the extortionist getting the most and the house getting a cool 25% for doing nothing but lending their name to the scam.

General
Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions

Corporate Lawyers
Cartoons | Code Of Ethics | Courtroom Remarks | Definition Of A Lie | Jokes | Lawyers | Lying | Who Have Lied

eBay - Land The Game

Definitions

Trademark Definitions
Blurring   |   Confusion   |   Damages   |   Dilution   |   History   |   Initial Interest Confusion   |   Likelihood Of Confusion   |   Material Difference Standard
Parallel Imports   |   Post-sale Confusion   |   Puffery   |   Secondary Meaning   |   Subsequent Confusion   |   Trademark Abuse
Unauthorized Use   |   Unfair Competition   |   What is a Trademark?
Copyright Definitions
Angel Policies   |   Contributory Infringement   |   Copyrightability   |   Copyright Extortion   |   Copyright Misuse Doctrine
; Derivative   |   The Digital Millennium Copyright Act   |   EULA   |   Fair Use   |   First Sale Doctrine   |   Product Description   |   Registration
Registration Denied   |   What is a Copyright?   |   What is not Copyrightable?
Other Issues
Embroidery Designs   |   FAQs & Whines   |   Image and Text Theft   |   Licensed Fabric   |   Licensing & Licenses   |   Patterns
Patterns Index   |   Profit   |   Quilting   |   Selvage   |   Stanford School of Law Case Outline
Tabberone Disclaimer   |   Trademark Extortion   |   Urban Myths   |   What To Do If You Are Veroed

Federal Court Cases
Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations

Federal Statutes
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22
<

VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program)
VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter
Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed

Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2017

 

 

 

wordpress analytics