Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won
not tay ber own

Tabbers Temptations     www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/ Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!

Tabberone Logo
The latest Hartsel weather.

  "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke


Collegiate Licensing Partnership Association
&
Licensing Resource Group

Hall Of Shame Members
Added February 27, 2007



   


Last Updated - December 13, 2009

So what do Iowa University, University of Hawaii, University of Iowa, Virginia Tech, Wake Forest and Western Michigan University have in common? They all hired the Collegiate Licensing Partnership Association ("CLPA") to be their low life scum ball cyber cops to police their trademarks on the internet. We are sure more institutions of higher learning will soon join these ranks as they are not the lest bit concerned with the legal rights of the Work At Home Moms ("WAHM") who were perfectly within their rights to make and sell items made from licensed fabrics.

This circus began when a division of Fabrique Innovations, Sykel Fabrics, began distributing licensed collegiate prints. Sy Garfinkel, president and head twit, began emailing people telling them to stop reselling the fabric and that they could not sell items made from the fabric. All hot air and lacking gonads, Sy Garfinkel never followed through on his threats of dire action although he did stupidly have his lawyer at Reed Smith, LLC send us a stupid threatening letter.

The second ring of the circus began in April 2006, when the Collegiate Licensing Company began terminating eBay auctions over the use of the licensed fabrics. They were met with opposition through legal arguments and appeared to back off of their position. It appears some asshole from Sykel Fabrics named Howard Leibowitz had a hand in this episode.

Now the third ring of the circus, bring in the clowns, the not very funny clowns, the Collegiate Licensing Partnership Association and the Licensing Resource Group ("LRG") who appears to own and operate CLPA. They are using some low life Cyber Cops by the redundant name of OpSec Security to troll the internet for them. Some moron named Jack Landrigan, Client and Legal Services Manager, appears to be the head clown at Licensing Resource Group. His fancy title would suggest he is an attorney but he is not a member of the Michigan Bar Association. Perhaps he is practicing law without a license? Nah. He is not that smart. But it appears Michael Van Wieren is more stupid than Jack.

When contacted by the eBay sellers, JackAss Landrigan can't be bothered to reply himself so he has a canned response sent to all who email him. JackAss Landrigan doesn't seem to know that paragraphs are his friend so his response is one long boring paragraph that shows his real lack of understanding of trademark law in general. So Jacky-poo, let us inform you.

The origin of the product that you sell was likely approved by the trademark owner; however, when a licensed product is altered and enhanced, that product becomes a new licensable good that is subject to the licensing requirements of the legal trademark owner.
Wrong armpit breath. In Precious Moments vs La Infantil, 971 F. Supp. 66 (D.P.R. 1997), the court ruled making licensed fabric into bedding and selling it was perfectly legal. But, when this argument was pointed out to JackAss Landrigan, the eBay seller received a response from one Michael Van Wieren, Doofus and Legal Counsel for Licensing Resource Group, LLC. The problem here is that the Michigan Bar Association does not list Michael Van Wieren, Doofus and Legal Counsel for Licensing Resource Group, LLC, as being licensed to practice in the State of Michigan. So Mike, isn't putting "Legal Counsel" after your name unethical? Or don't you care? We think you don't. Why? We'll tell you.

Mike "I am not a lawyer" Van Wieren dismisses the Precious Moments case as being copyright and therefore not relevant. However, Mike "I am not a lawyer" Van Wieren, the court said making licensed fabric into bedding and selling it was perfectly legal. But you don't really care because your employer is paying you to lie to the victims of their actions. And you lie well, just like a flea-ridden rug. But then, you are just another bottom-feeding corporate lawyer who sits back and collects the pay check after trying to ruin the lives of a lot of small businesses and Work At Home Moms ("WAHM"). And you don't care that some of these people are supplementing their incomes because of disability or disease that renders them unable to hold a full time job. Not, not you. You have yours so to hell with them and their rights. Your country club dues trump their rights.

Our attitude is to hell with the Collegiate Licensing Partnership Association and the Licensing Resource Group; both suck. As do their owners, managers and employees.

 

 

Rebuttals

In an effort to provide a balanced view, we make the following offer to anyone who feels they have been wrongly accused on this web site.

If you, or your company, have been referenced on these pages, and you would like the chance to post a rebuttal, we will post your rebuttal (provided it is in good taste) so others can read it. The rebuttal must be submitted in a format that can easily be converted into HTML. We reserve the right to alter the rebuttal to make it more readable. However, we will not alter the content (unless there is offensive material to be removed). We also reserve the right to comment on any rebuttal received. Emails protesting the content of this web site may be treated as rebuttals by us at our discretion.

General
Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions

Corporate Lawyers
Cartoons | Code Of Ethics | Courtroom Remarks | Definition Of A Lie | Jokes | Lawyers | Lying | Who Have Lied

eBay - Land The Game

Definitions

Trademark Definitions
Blurring   |   Confusion   |   Damages   |   Dilution   |   History   |   Initial Interest Confusion   |   Likelihood Of Confusion   |   Material Difference Standard
Parallel Imports   |   Post-sale Confusion   |   Puffery   |   Secondary Meaning   |   Subsequent Confusion   |   Trademark Abuse
Unauthorized Use   |   Unfair Competition   |   What is a Trademark?
Copyright Definitions
Angel Policies   |   Contributory Infringement   |   Copyrightability   |   Copyright Extortion   |   Copyright Misuse Doctrine
; Derivative   |   The Digital Millennium Copyright Act   |   EULA   |   Fair Use   |   First Sale Doctrine   |   Product Description   |   Registration
Registration Denied   |   What is a Copyright?   |   What is not Copyrightable?
Other Issues
Embroidery Designs   |   FAQs & Whines   |   Image and Text Theft   |   Licensed Fabric   |   Licensing & Licenses   |   Patterns
Patterns Index   |   Profit   |   Quilting   |   Selvage   |   Stanford School of Law Case Outline
Tabberone Disclaimer   |   Trademark Extortion   |   Urban Myths   |   What To Do If You Are Veroed

Federal Court Cases
Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations

Federal Statutes
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22
<

VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program)
VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter
Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed

Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2016

 

 

iweb counter