Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won
not tay ber own

Tabbers Temptations     www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/ Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!

Tabberone Logo
The latest Hartsel weather.

 

  "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke


Coalition To Advance The Protection Of Sports Logos
Cyber Cop
Hall Of Shame Member
Added December 5, 2010

Last Updated - June 9, 2011

WARNING - We highly recommend that you do not send these people, or their partners in extortion, Trademark Management, any money whatsoever. In our opinion, no reputable organization claiming to represent a company would have you make out a payment for alleged damages to a third party. Such a demand probably violates fraud statutes and consumer protection statues in most states. Lisa Uriguen Armstrong is not an attorney and under Idaho law has no legal right to negotiate or act on the behalf of anyone as though she is an attorney. Demand the name of the attorney representing CAPS. Do not speak to anyone at CAPS until you have the name of the attorney. And then verify that name with the Idaho Bar to make sure that the person is license to practice law in Idaho. Additionally, we do not believe you are required to provide them with any information concerning any activities they allege you have committed. We do not believe you have to answer any questions they ask because they are not legally representing the teams the teams they claim to represent because under Idaho Law they do not have the right to practice law. CAPS does not have the legal authority to take you to court in the name of the CAPS Members. CAPS has become desperate. CAPS has obtained letters from the NBA, MLB, CLC, NHL and others but to what end? Click Here to read the letters and why they do not apply and why they are more of the same old scam.

Like bed bugs, Cyber Cops seem to be everywhere. They are just as pesky, they like to suck blood and they have no real function except to annoy. It seems the Coalition To Advance The Protection Of Sports Logos ("CAPS") is not satisfied with just being a Cyber Cop - CAPS has evolved into trademark extortion as well. And CAPS claims to have some hefty clients as well: Major League Baseball Properties, the National Hockey League, the National Basketball Association, Collegiate Licensing and the National Football League. Impressive? But is it true? No too long ago, someone we know was attacked by Major League Baseball Properties through their New York office. So we ask, why would the MLBP be using some shit can outfit like CAPS if they are doing their own work? Does the MLBP know what CAPS is doing? Does the MLBP know who CAPS is? Does the MLBP care who CAPS is? Inquiring minds want to know.

Just because a company "claims" to represent some entity does not mean that they really have the legal right to send cease and desist letters and to make legal demands. The professional sports leagues have their own people policing for trademark and copyright infringement. So why would they knowingly affiliate themselves with a company like CAPS that sends out form letters that lack substance and particulars? And, from what we can determine, CAPS has no licensed attorney on staff. Demand letters for third parties are being sent out over the signature of non-lawyers. One recent demand letter listed some 180 universities and college bowls that CAPS claims to represent. Since the extortionist demand checks are to be made payable to Trademark Management, how does anyone really know ANY of the monies collected are going to the schools? If CAPS does not have a licensed attorney on staff, do you want to bet they also do not have an accountant? If, as we claim, they are lying to collect money then are they lying when it comes time to remit the money to the CAPS Members? We think so. It appears to be a logical conclusion.


DEFEND YOURSELF FROM CAPS
If you are contacted by CAPS and they demand money from you, this is what we suggest you do.
First, just because CAPS claims your use was infringing that does not make it so. CAPS lies because it is in the extortion racket.

Second, demand written proof from CAPS that CAPS is authorized to legally represent the teams that CAPS claims you have infringed. Do not take their word for it. And do not accept their brush-off response of "conduct your own research" and their claims they could not terminate eBay listings if they were "posing to be something they are not." eBay does not confirm the right of a VeRO member. eBay only accepts their word for it. Anyone with a fax machine and a willingness to lie can become a VeRO member.

Third, acting as legal counsel for the teams, CAPS has not indicated that Lisa Uriguen Armstrong is an attorney and state that you cannot find any indication that she is licensed to practice law - which is very true because she is not. Her demand letters clearly fall within the Idaho definition of practicing law and you want to know where she is licensed. Otherwise she lacks the legal authority to enter into a binding contract for any team she claims to represent.

Fourth, demand your listings be restored if CAPS does not comply with YOUR demands.

Fifth, do not pay them a dime. No reputable representative of any company would have you make the payment payable to a third party. It is a scam.

Sixth, feel free to include the link to this page in your emails to CAPS.

Seventh, CAPS knows about these pages and has known for some time. If we were lying, do you not think they would have sued us by now?


Our opinion is the Coalition To Advance The Protection Of Sports Logos is pure Mickey Mouse (no offense meant to Disney). To begin with, right click on one of their web pages and you get that silly little error box that is supposed to stop you from downloading pictures. One, the code is faulty, so it does not work, and two, it is sooooo easy to get around it. That is soooo stoopid. FYI to CAPS - trademarks are not copyrighted.


Next, who is Trademark Management? The web site for CAPS, www.capsinfo.com, is owned by Trademark Management. The address for Trademark Management is 122 E. Poplar Avenue, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814, which, by a strange coincidence, is the same address for CAPS! How about that? And, it appears that Trademark Management is owned and operated by the very same Lisa Uriguen Armstrong, also called Witch-On-A-Stick, who seems to own and operate CAPS! Wow. And, Trademark Management claims to have the same clients, plus a few more, as the same clients as CAPS and TM also lists CAPS as a client. Talk about padding ones resume.

The question here is why the duplicity? Why form two companies, both at the same address, both doing the same work, both with the same personnel? While it may not be, it certainly sounds nefarious. Who is hiding what from whom? Hmmmm? Tell us, Lisa. We will report any lies you tell us. And lies they will be we are sure. Because that is what Cyber Cops and trademark extortionists do: they lie, and lie, and then they lie some more.

From an email we received we now know that one Lindsay Conn and one Hallie Alexander work at Trademark Management. Lindsay seems as doofy as her Hollywood namesake in her claims in the email. Telling someone to "conduct your own research into CAPS" seems awfully snotty instead of proving the documentation requested. And, as we stated further up the page, anyone with a fax machine and a willingness to lie can become a VeRO member so her statements about eBay lack and credibility. Perhaps she believes that having once been a paralegal gives her a better snotty posture? Claiming to be a "legal assistant" does not give one stature.


Let us start with a letter sent to a non-infringer by some nimrod at CAPS named Rhett Barney - the letter has our deconstruction alongside the original. The tone and structure of the letter sent by nimrod Rhett Barney would make one believe that he is an attorney. Note that he did not include any title but he lists himself on the internet as a "Trademark Enforcement Intern at Trademark Management, Inc" and a legal intern at CAPS. This is interesting because Rhett Barney is not listed as being a licensed attorney in Idaho (did we mention that Idaho is where CAPS and TM are located?), nor is Rhett Barney listed as being a licensed attorney in the State of Washington, however, Rhett Barnet IS LISTED as being a law student at Gonzaga University School of Law in Spokane, Washington. What is a law student doing sending email letters representing himself as a licensed attorney? Did he not take basic legal ethics yet? Or did he sleep through them like most law students? Sending an error-laden letter of this type out over his signature constitutes badly practicing law without a license.

And it would appear that the nimrod at CAPS named Rhett Barney has a "friend" named "BEN" who "became very disturbed" when he read what we had to say about nimrod Rhett. Ben's email goes on to defend his good buddy and does a poor job of taking us to task on the issue. Wasn't "BEN" the name of a rat in a movie some years ago? Seems appropriate.


So, who is Lisa Uriguen Armstrong? She also sends out threatening letters to alleged infringers. We should point out that not all of the recipients of the letters are innocent - that many are infringing, but many are not. That said, it is the extortion demands to which we object. Most of these extortion demands are made under the color of legal authority, which from what we can see, does not exist. Like her partner in crime, Rhett Barney, it seems that while Lisa Uriguen Armstrong dispatches letters making legal conclusions and representations followed by cease and desist demands, and ending with threats of potential litigation, Lisa Uriguen Armstrong is not licensed to practice law in Idaho. It appears that at one time she may have been a paralegal in California, that does not qualify her under the law to present herself as the legal representative of major sports organizations. She wants others to follow the rules while she does not? Her defense? "I never said I was a lawyer".


The letters are obviously form letters. They are expansive in nature, covering all of the "CAPS Members" and talking in general terms. We are guessing that many get sent out every week. A shotgun approach - fire away and hope you hit something. Serious cease and desist letters site examples of infractions, dates, times, places, etc. They are specific. And they come from lawyers, not legal impersonators. The letters that are sent out also give the false impression that the recipient will be sued by CAPS on behalf of its members. That is highly unlikely. The extortion demand is the last indicator. Tracking trademark infringement is a cost of doing business. Inflated demands for a monetary settlement show the motive for CAPS is financial, not trade protection. The checks are ordered to be made out to Trademark Management which means CAPS gets funding from these extortion demands and that is the real motivation. If it looks like a pile of shit, and it smell like a pile of shit, it probably is CAPS. Sorry, we meant a pile of shit.

Now impersonating a lawyer is one Lindsay Conn. She is signing the form letters supposedly because Lisa's hand is getting cramps? As of the end of 2010, we have Larry, Moe and Curly all running around CAPS yelling, "Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck" and smacking each other on the nose. Let us send them a case of seltzer water because they are a bunch of clowns in search of a banana peel.

General
Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions

Corporate Lawyers
Cartoons | Code Of Ethics | Courtroom Remarks | Definition Of A Lie | Jokes | Lawyers | Lying | Who Have Lied

eBay - Land The Game

Links
Auction Bytes | Public Citizen Litigation Group

Definitions

Trademark Definitions
Blurring   |   Confusion   |   Damages   |   Dilution   |   History   |   Initial Interest Confusion   |   Likelihood Of Confusion   |   Material Difference Standard
Parallel Imports   |   Post-sale Confusion   |   Puffery   |   Secondary Meaning   |   Subsequent Confusion   |   Trademark Abuse
Unauthorized Use   |   Unfair Competition   |   What is a Trademark?
Copyright Definitions
Angel Policies   |   Contributory Infringement   |   Copyrightability   |   Copyright Extortion   |   Copyright Misuse Doctrine   |   Derivative   |   The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
EULA   |   Fair Use   |   First Sale Doctrine   |   Product Description   |   Registration   |   Registration Denied   |   What is a Copyright?   |   What is not Copyrightable?
Other Issues
Embroidery Designs   |   FAQs & Whines   |   Image and Text Theft   |   Licensed Fabric   |   Licensing & Licenses   |   Patterns   |   Patterns Index   |   Profit   |   Quilting
Selvage   |   Stanford School of Law Case Outline   |   Tabberone Disclaimer   |   Trademark Extortion   |   Urban Myths   |   What To Do If You Are Veroed

Federal Court Cases
Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations

Federal Statutes
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22

Federal Lawsuits
Filing A Federal Lawsuit
Setting Up | Standing. | Joinder of Parties. | The Complaint | Their Answer | Default Judgment
F.R.C.P. 12(b) Motion | F.R.C.P. 12(f) Motion | Your Reply | Summary Judgment Motion | Affidavits | Time Extension

Defending Against A Federal Lawsuit
The Complaint | Your Answer | Denials | F.R.C.P. 12(b) Motion | F.R.C.P. 12(f) Motion | Affidavits | Time Extension

VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program)
VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter
Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed

Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2012