Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won
Wiggles Touring Pty Limited|
An Australian Company
Hall Of Shame Member
Wiggles Touring Pty Limited is a kid's oriented company with a snotty adult attitude. Like some others, they felt others lawfully
using their copyrighted products was unacceptable. A nice sentiment but under US law, fair use and the first sale doctrine allow this activity.
It just goes to prove that stupid ideas are not the domain of just US VeRO members.
Bright and early on November 17, 2003, eBay terminated an auction using a Wiggles applique and sent to Tabberone a WhyEnded email. The typical canned trash eBay sends to all offering little or no real help and giving no real reason for the takedown.
Wiggles had taken exception to an apron Tabberone had on auction using an alternate seller ID.
Naturally, Tabberone immediately sent an email to Wiggles and they responded rather quickly from Down Under about what they don't permit. Most of their tripe was "go look at what eBay says" instead of them straining their collective brains to give someone a reasonable and legitimate answer. One could draw the conclusion they don't allow ANY licensed product to be sold on eBay.
Not Acceptable. Tabberone immediately fired back an answer to which Wiggles sent a threatening email about lawyers and such with MORE mindless gabage about "go look at what eBay says".
On November 24, 2003, Wiggles replied to Tabberone's email in which Tabberone had announced to Wiggles that a lawsuit had been filed in Denver, #03-D-2335 (PAC), and that they would be emailed a copy soon.
After a few conversations, a settlement agreement in principle was reached on March 9, 2004. Isn't it amazing, another eBay VeRO member who QUICKLY caved after being sued? Gee, what ever happened to standing up for one's principles? Looks like Wiggles and company don't have any. If they did, they never would have started ending legitimate eBay auctions. Didn't wiggle out of this fine mess, did you boys?
After receiving the signed documents, Tabberone filed papers with the court dismissing with prejudice the complaint filed against Wiggles. Another company that was willing to interfere with internet sales but unwilling to fight the issues in court. Do we hear a clucking noise coming from Down Under?
In an effort to provide a balanced view, we make the following offer to anyone who feels they have been wrongly accused on this web site.
If you, or your company, have been referenced on these pages, and you would like the chance to post a rebuttal, we will post your rebuttal (provided it is in good taste) so others can read it. The rebuttal must be submitted in a format that can easily be converted into HTML. We reserve the right to alter the rebuttal to make it more readable. However, we will not alter the content (unless there is offensive material to be removed). We also reserve the right to comment on any rebuttal received. Emails protesting the content of this web site may be treated as rebuttals by us at our discretion.
Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions
Initial Interest Confusion |
Likelihood Of Confusion |
Material Difference Standard
Parallel Imports | Post-sale Confusion | Puffery | Secondary Meaning | Subsequent Confusion | Trademark Abuse
Unauthorized Use | Unfair Competition | What is a Trademark?
Angel Policies |
Contributory Infringement |
Copyright Extortion |
Copyright Misuse Doctrine
; Derivative | The Digital Millennium Copyright Act | EULA | Fair Use | First Sale Doctrine | Product Description | Registration
Registration Denied | What is a Copyright? | What is not Copyrightable?
Embroidery Designs |
FAQs & Whines |
Image and Text Theft |
Licensed Fabric |
Licensing & Licenses |
Patterns Index | Profit | Quilting | Selvage | Stanford School of Law Case Outline
Tabberone Disclaimer | Trademark Extortion | Urban Myths | What To Do If You Are Veroed
Federal Court Cases |
Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations
Federal Statutes |
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22
VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program)|
VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter
Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed
|Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2017|