Tabberone is pronounced tab ber won
not tay ber own

Tabbers Temptations     www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/ Home | Site Index | Disclaimer | Email Me!

Tabberone Logo
The latest Hartsel weather.

  "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke

Our Fight(s)

Our fight began in August, 2001, with Warner Brothers. The first incident only took a few days to resolve and a number of telephone call.

Tabberone 1, VeRO Trademark/Copyright 0.

In September, 2001, we got involved with M&M/Mars. They cancelled some of our auctions in January, 2002. In July, 2002, Mars filed a 396-page 4-pound law suit against us in federal court in new York. In November, 2002, Mars offered to withdraw the law suit. They withdrew it when agreed to a settlement where we could continue making items from M&M/Mars fabric.

Tabberone 2, VeRO Trademark/Copyright 0.

On October 15, 2002, while we were engaged with M&M/Mars, Precious Moments sent us a "cease and desist" email making demands. We refused, citing their own lost lawsuit in 1997, Precious Moments vs La Infantil 1997, (D.P.R.) 971 F.Supp. 66. We never heard from Precious Moments again.

Tabberone 3, VeRO Trademark/Copyright 0.

On September 4, 2002, Disney Enterprises terminated three of our eBay auctions. Since we were tied up with M&M/Mars, we decided to wait until that fight was resolved before fighting Disney. When M&M/Mars stettled in late November, we turned our attention to Disney. On December 24, 2002, we filed a complaint in the Federal District Court for Colorado against Disney. In late January, 2003, Disney offered us a settlement whereby we could continue making and selling items we made from licensed Disney fabrics.

Tabberone 4, VeRO Trademark/Copyright 0.

On March 31, 2003, Major League Baseball Properties shut down three of our eBay auctions. On April 3, 2003, we filed a complaint in the Federal District Court for Colorado against MLBP. On June 23, 2003, Major League Baseball filed their somewhat lame response. On June 26th, we filed for Summary Judgment based upon the pleadings. On August 21, 2003, MLBP signed a "Tabberone Agreement" whereby they agree to leave us alone in return for dropping the lawsuit against them. The settlement aggrement, like the Disney agreement, is posted on the web site.

Tabberone 5, VeRO Trademark/Copyright 0.

On October 22, 2003, Robert Yates Racing terminated an auction. After a few emails, they contacted eBay and had the auction reinstated on October 23, 2003.

Tabberone 6, VeRO Trademark/Copyright 0.

Complaint of Tortious Business Interference, Outrageous Conduct, Negligent Misrepresentation and Fraudulent Misrepresentation Under Colorado Law and Perjury Under 17 U.S.C. §512, 03-D-2128 PAC, October 28, 2003, US District Court for Colorado. Plaintiffs sued Shabby Chic. Shabby Chic terminated an eBay auction where the plaintiffs were selling a cross stitch kit titled "Shabby Chic Cross Stitch Kit". Plaintiffs contended "shabby chic" was a generic decorating term and therefore not protected under trademark laws. Case has been settled and the settlement agreement is confidential.

Tabberone 7, VeRO Trademark/Copyright 0.

On November 18, 2003, Tabberone sued United Media. UM had ordered six eBay auctions terminated based upon the use of their Peanuts fabrics to make the items. In December 2003, a settlement agreement was reached with UM agreeing not to interfere with future use and sale of their products by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs withdrew their complaint.

Tabberone 8, VeRO Trademark/Copyright 0.

 

Is it just us or does anyone else out there see a pattern here?

General
Articles | Cease and Desist Letters | Federal Court Cases | FAQs & Whines | Glossary | Hall Of Shame | Contributions

Corporate Lawyers
Cartoons | Code Of Ethics | Courtroom Remarks | Definition Of A Lie | Jokes | Lawyers | Lying | Who Have Lied

eBay - Land The Game

Definitions

Trademark Definitions
Blurring   |   Confusion   |   Damages   |   Dilution   |   History   |   Initial Interest Confusion   |   Likelihood Of Confusion   |   Material Difference Standard
Parallel Imports   |   Post-sale Confusion   |   Puffery   |   Secondary Meaning   |   Subsequent Confusion   |   Trademark Abuse
Unauthorized Use   |   Unfair Competition   |   What is a Trademark?
Copyright Definitions
Angel Policies   |   Contributory Infringement   |   Copyrightability   |   Copyright Extortion   |   Copyright Misuse Doctrine
Derivative   |   The Digital Millennium Copyright Act   |   EULA   |   Fair Use   |   First Sale Doctrine   |   Product Description
Registration   |   Registration Denied   |   What is a Copyright?   |   What is not Copyrightable?
Other Issues
Embroidery Designs   |   FAQs & Whines   |   Image and Text Theft   |   Licensed Fabric   |   Licensing & Licenses
Patterns   |   Patterns Index   |   Profit   |   Quilting   |   Selvage   |   Stanford School of Law Case Outline
Tabberone Disclaimer   |   Trademark Extortion   |   Urban Myths   |   What To Do If You Are Veroed

Federal Court Cases
Alphabetically | by Federal Circuit | by Subject | by Court Quotations

Federal Statutes
Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 5 | Digital Millenium Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 12 | Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 22

VeRO (Verified Right's Owner Program)
VeRO Commandments | VeRO-Verified Rights Owners Program | Counter Notice Letter
Counter Notice (pre-2003) | Counter Notice present | On-Line Survey from 2004 | Articles about VeRO | What To Do If You Are Veroed

Original material by Karen Dudnikov & Michael Meadors is © 1999-2019